Why was this “child sex gang leader” released from prison 17 years early?

Is Mubarek (Max) Ali actually being released early?

A barrister blogger reveals the legal background behind release of the convict.

“For the media, a salutary, but no doubt entirely disregarded, lesson to verify the context of legal stories, either with the lawyers employed in your offices to check these things, or even by approaching some of us grubby legal hacks lurking in the social media gutter. If a story on sentencing appears too ludicrous to be true, it almost certainly is.”

https://thesecretbarrister.com/2017/07/31/why-was-this-child-sex-gang-leader-released-from-prison-17-years-early/

Why was this “child sex gang leader” released from prison 17 years early?

A quick one to start the week. I was asked about this last night, and rather hoped that it was obvious on its face that this tale has more to it than the headlines in the local press would have the…

14 thoughts on “Why was this “child sex gang leader” released from prison 17 years early?

  • August 13, 2017 at 9:40 am
    Permalink

    Very interesting reading- and an explanation to a mis leading head lines

    Reply
    • August 14, 2017 at 12:09 am
      Permalink

      Whats misleading is the ridiculous sentencing! 22 yrs should mean 22 yrs

      Reply
  • August 13, 2017 at 9:50 am
    Permalink

    These preditors need to be sentenced to life meaning whole life . Thankyou to thesecretbarrister for explaining how he is being released early, makes interesting reading, I think people would have started this petition sooner if the sentence had been more transparent

    Reply
  • August 13, 2017 at 9:59 am
    Permalink

    It just shows how people can be fed the wrong “facts” just to cause a storm. It’s one of the worst things about social media. No one checks the “facts”, just bang off a post with one eye on the TV. Pity this was not put out there when Lucy Allan spoke in parliament. Mind you, she should have known the “facts” and could easily have corrected many.

    Reply
    • August 14, 2017 at 12:13 am
      Permalink

      The wrong facts are being delibrately fed to us by the courts. 22 years is nothing for what that evil monster did but 5 is a kick in the teeth for his victims causing them more fear and stress. Barristers make me sick, read about the defence barrister in this case he needs locking up himself he treated the poor victims disgracefully.

      Reply
  • August 13, 2017 at 10:29 am
    Permalink

    Who cares how the sentence is broken down time on remand and other factors. Truth is these child rapists are laughing at us he is probably already looking at setting up another child prostitution ring for him n his brothers on his release. 5 years for raping and exploiting children fucking disgusting

    Reply
  • August 13, 2017 at 10:30 am
    Permalink

    A useful story, but it still seems outrageous that a) he was only sentenced to 14 years and b) that he is released half-way through. Even the updated guidelines which would see him serve a supposedly tough ten years seem lax.

    Reply
  • August 13, 2017 at 10:35 am
    Permalink

    So the point being it’s a legally correct release. Still doesn’t change the fact that ultimately he’s out 5 years after he got sent down. What ever legal waffle is behind it, that’s the ultimate fact and it’s not right.

    Reply
    • August 14, 2017 at 12:06 am
      Permalink

      Exacly! How dare fool the public and the victims by saying his sentence is 22 years when in reality and as faf as the victims are cocerned its only 5
      Bloody disgraceful bullshit joke of a law system in Britain

      Reply
  • August 13, 2017 at 1:00 pm
    Permalink

    Typical of our system. This country should be ashamed of itself, yet again it fails our victims of crime. No wonder these vile people give the ‘middle finger’ on the way to court! What a disgrace!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *